 |
| Titel |
Comment on "Another look at climate sensitivity" by Zaliapin and Ghil (2010) |
| VerfasserIn |
G. H. Roe, M. B. Baker |
| Medientyp |
Artikel
|
| Sprache |
Englisch
|
| ISSN |
1023-5809
|
| Digitales Dokument |
URL |
| Erschienen |
In: Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics ; 18, no. 1 ; Nr. 18, no. 1 (2011-02-18), S.125-127 |
| Datensatznummer |
250013874
|
| Publikation (Nr.) |
 copernicus.org/npg-18-125-2011.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
| Zusammenfassung |
| Zaliapin and Ghil (hereafter, ZG) claim that the linearity of the climate
feedback model in Roe and Baker (2007) (hereafter, RB) invalidates our
derivation of the well-known skewed shapes of published probability
distributions (pdfs) of climate sensitivity. We show here that linearity is
fully justified. Nonlinearity could be of some importance only if the focus
is on exotic and improbable events, which appear to be the focus of ZG,
instead of the sensitivity pdfs, which were the focus of RB. |
| |
|
| Teil von |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|