|
Titel |
Assessing the quality of landslide susceptibility maps – case study Lower Austria |
VerfasserIn |
H. Petschko, A. Brenning, R. Bell, J. Goetz, T. Glade |
Medientyp |
Artikel
|
Sprache |
Englisch
|
ISSN |
1561-8633
|
Digitales Dokument |
URL |
Erschienen |
In: Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences ; 14, no. 1 ; Nr. 14, no. 1 (2014-01-16), S.95-118 |
Datensatznummer |
250118234
|
Publikation (Nr.) |
copernicus.org/nhess-14-95-2014.pdf |
|
|
|
Zusammenfassung |
Landslide susceptibility maps are helpful tools to identify areas
potentially prone to future landslide occurrence. As more and more national
and provincial authorities demand for these maps to be computed and
implemented in spatial planning strategies, several aspects of the quality
of the landslide susceptibility model and the resulting classified map are
of high interest. In this study of landslides in Lower Austria, we focus on
the model form uncertainty to assess the quality of a flexible statistical
modelling technique, the generalized additive model (GAM). The study area
(15 850 km2) is divided into 16 modelling domains based on lithology
classes. A model representing the entire study area is constructed by
combining these models. The performances of the models are assessed using
repeated k-fold cross-validation with spatial and random subsampling. This
reflects the variability of performance estimates arising from sampling
variation. Measures of spatial transferability and thematic consistency are
applied to empirically assess model quality. We also analyse and visualize
the implications of spatially varying prediction uncertainties regarding the
susceptibility map classes by taking into account the confidence intervals
of model predictions. The 95% confidence limits fall within the same
susceptibility class in 85% of the study area. Overall, this study
contributes to advancing open communication and assessment of model quality
related to statistical landslide susceptibility models. |
|
|
Teil von |
|
|
|
|
|
|