|
Titel |
Negative correlation between terminal velocity and VHF radar reflectivity: observation and plausible explanation |
VerfasserIn |
C.-L. Su, Y.-H. Chu, I.-Y. Lo |
Medientyp |
Artikel
|
Sprache |
Englisch
|
ISSN |
0992-7689
|
Digitales Dokument |
URL |
Erschienen |
In: Annales Geophysicae ; 27, no. 4 ; Nr. 27, no. 4 (2009-04-06), S.1631-1642 |
Datensatznummer |
250016487
|
Publikation (Nr.) |
copernicus.org/angeo-27-1631-2009.pdf |
|
|
|
Zusammenfassung |
The correlation between precipitation backscatter P (or radar reflectivity
Z) and reflectivity-weighted terminal velocity Vt has long been thought
to be positive. Namely, the larger the magnitude of the terminal velocity
is, the stronger the radar reflectivity will be, and vice versa. However, we
will show in this article the observational evidences of negative Vt–P
correlation made with the Chung-Li VHF radar. It is found that the negative
Vt–P correlation can occur in the regions from close to ground to well
above the melting layer. In addition, there is a strong tendency for the
negative t–P correlation to occur around the bright band region. In
light of the fact that the conventional model of single drop size
distribution cannot explain this negative correlation, it is proposed that
the drop size distribution responsible for the negative Vt–Z
correlation is composed of two Gamma drop size distributions with respective
mean terminal velocities and radar reflectivities. The precipitation
particles of these two distributions are assumed to dynamically interact in
the way that the total numbers of the precipitation particles of the two
Gamma distributions are varied and their reflectivities are also changed
accordingly. Theoretical analysis shows that the key factor determining the
sign of the Vt–Z correlation is the ratio of the difference between
relative changes in the reflectivities of the two Gamma drop size
distributions to the change in the total reflectivity. The Vt–Z
correlation is negative (or positive) if the ratio is positive (or
negative). From these results, it follows that the Vt–Z correlation
could be considered to be the result of the redistribution of the radar
reflectivies of the two Gamma drop size distributions caused by the
interaction of the precipitation particles between them. Different
interaction processes of the precipitation particles, such as break-up and
coalescence, could give rise to the same Vt–Z correlation, depending on
the net change in the total reflectivity. In addition, the results also show
that the same interaction process might give opposite Vt–Z
correlations. Therefore, great caution is advised when the Vt–Z
correlation is employed to interpret the precipitation process. |
|
|
Teil von |
|
|
|
|
|
|