|
Titel |
Aerosol microphysics modules in the framework of the ECHAM5 climate model – intercomparison under stratospheric conditions |
VerfasserIn |
H. Kokkola, R. Hommel, J. Kazil, U. Niemeier, A.-I. Partanen, J. Feichter, C. Timmreck |
Medientyp |
Artikel
|
Sprache |
Englisch
|
ISSN |
1991-959X
|
Digitales Dokument |
URL |
Erschienen |
In: Geoscientific Model Development ; 2, no. 2 ; Nr. 2, no. 2 (2009-07-28), S.97-112 |
Datensatznummer |
250000539
|
Publikation (Nr.) |
copernicus.org/gmd-2-97-2009.pdf |
|
|
|
Zusammenfassung |
In this manuscript, we present an intercomparison of three different
aerosol microphysics modules that are implemented in the climate
model ECHAM5. The comparison was done between the modal aerosol
microphysics module M7, which is currently the default aerosol
microphysical core in ECHAM5, and two sectional aerosol microphysics
modules SALSA, and SAM2. The detailed aerosol microphysical model MAIA
was used as a reference to evaluate the results of the aerosol
microphysics modules with respect to sulphate aerosol.
The ability of the modules to describe the development of the
aerosol size distribution was tested in a zero dimensional
framework. We evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of different
approaches under different types of stratospheric conditions. Also,
we present an improved method for the time integration in M7 and
study how the setup of the modal aerosol modules affects the evolution of
the aerosol size distribution.
Intercomparison simulations were carried out with varying
SO2 concentrations from background conditions to extreme
values arising from stratospheric injections by large volcanic
eruptions. Under background conditions, all microphysics modules
were in good agreement describing the shape of the aerosol size distribution,
but the scatter between the model results increased with increasing
SO2 concentrations. In particular in the volcanic case the
setups of the aerosol modules have to be adapted in order to dependably
capture the evolution of the aerosol size distribution, and to perform in
global model simulations.
In summary, this intercomparison serves as a review of the different
aerosol microphysics modules which are currently available for the
climate model ECHAM5. |
|
|
Teil von |
|
|
|
|
|
|