dot
Detailansicht
Katalogkarte GBA
Katalogkarte ISBD
Suche präzisieren
Drucken
Download RIS
Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen
Titel Testing the kinematics and timing of the opening of the Amerasia Basin through a new coupled plate kinematic and mantle convection model
VerfasserIn G. Shephard, R. D. Müller, C. Heine
Konferenz EGU General Assembly 2012
Medientyp Artikel
Sprache Englisch
Digitales Dokument PDF
Erschienen In: GRA - Volume 14 (2012)
Datensatznummer 250064736
 
Zusammenfassung
One of the most elusive aspects in the evolution of the Arctic is the origin and timing of the opening of the Amerasia Basin. The Amerasia Basin’s central location within the Arctic province makes it a centerpiece in tectonic reconstructions; however its pre-rift configuration and kinematic development remains unclear. To date, several tectonic models have been proposed to explain the evolution of the Amerasia Basin including rotation models, transform and strike slip models incorporating various shear margins and extensional processes. The most widely accepted models suggest that during the Late Jurassic the Arctic Alaska-Chukotka microplate (AACM) underwent counter-clockwise rotation from the Canadian margin due to rifting and seafloor spreading. However many aspects of this model remain debated including the existence and geometry of an intra-Arctic subduction zone and subduction of an ancient ocean basin, the extent and initial geometry of the AACM and whether the Lomonosov Ridge represents a shear, extensional or transform margin. Here, based on a digitized set of tectonic features with time-dependent deformation and rotational histories we aim to test these main conflicting tectonic models. Through the construction of topologically-closed polygons for the Arctic since the Mesozoic with the software GPlates, we can ultimately test the different models in a geodynamic context. We compare predicted mantle structure based on imposed surface kinematics to seismic tomography to discern long-wavelength discrepancies between models and provide a new approach to reconciling Arctic tectonics.