![Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen](images/unchecked.gif) |
Titel |
High levels of particulate matter due to ash plume and ash re-suspension following the Eyjafjallajökull eruption |
VerfasserIn |
Thröstur Thorsteinsson, Thorsteinn Jóhannsson, Gudrun Petursdottir |
Konferenz |
EGU General Assembly 2011
|
Medientyp |
Artikel
|
Sprache |
Englisch
|
Digitales Dokument |
PDF |
Erschienen |
In: GRA - Volume 13 (2011) |
Datensatznummer |
250055863
|
|
|
|
Zusammenfassung |
The dangers to people living near a volcano due to lava and pyroclastic flow, and, on ice or
snow covered volcanoes, jökulhlaup (floods) are well known. The level of risk due to ash fall
is, however, not as well known.
The eruption at Eyjafjallajökull, 14 April to 20 May 2010 (last day of visible plume),
produced abundant particulate matter (PM). After the volcanic activity ceased high
PM concentration has been measured on several occasions, due to re-suspended
ash.
The particulate matter (PM10) concentration in the small town of Vík, 38 km south-east
from the erupting Eyjafjallajökull volcano, reached levels that are 25 times the
recommended health limit of 50 μg m-3 averaged over 24 hours, on 7 May 2010,
with 10-min values reaching 13000 μg m-3. Even after the eruption, values as
high as >8000 μg m-3 (10-min average), and >900 μg m-3 (24-h average), were
measured.
In Reykjavik, 125 km WNW of the volcano, the PM10 concentration reached over 2000
μg m-3 (10-min average) during an ash storm event on 4 June 2010. The annual
concentration in Reykjavik is about 25 μg m-3, and the only previous events of comparable
magnitude are peaks during New Year’s Eve celebration.
The eruption at Eyjafjallajökull posed a potential health risk to the inhabitants in the
regions hit by severe ash fall. However, preliminary studies indicate that the ash has had
minor short term health effects. Studies show that the crystalline silica content of the ash is
negligible, so that the persistence of deposited ash in the soils and environment should not
present a significant silicosis hazard. During periods of PM10 concentration over about 5000
μg m-3, most residents stayed indoors, or wore protective air filters and goggles when they
had to go outside.
A study is ongoing to examine the potential long term health effects of the volcanic
eruption, including the high concentration of PM10 during and after the eruption due to
re-suspended ash in the area. |
|
|
|
|
|