dot
Detailansicht
Katalogkarte GBA
Katalogkarte ISBD
Suche präzisieren
Drucken
Download RIS
Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen
Titel A carbon budget of Norway: integration of terrestrial and aquatic C fluxes
VerfasserIn Heleen A. de Wit, Kari Austnes, Lise Dalsgaard, Gro Hylen
Konferenz EGU General Assembly 2013
Medientyp Artikel
Sprache Englisch
Digitales Dokument PDF
Erschienen In: GRA - Volume 15 (2013)
Datensatznummer 250076433
 
Zusammenfassung
The land sink for atmospheric CO2 in northern landscapes is significant but its size and future strength is debated. Aquatic export of C, often disregarded in terrestrial C sinks estimates, can be significant. Here, we quantify C stocks and sinks in main land cover categories in Norway for 1990-2008, and evaluate the relative importance of terrestrial uptake and aquatic losses of C in the four major discharge areas of Norway. Forest inventory data, a soil model, a soil C database, literature data, and river monitoring data are used to quantify C stocks and fluxes and their uncertainty. The mean annual C uptake in terrestrial ecosystems Norway was 6.1 ± 0.3 Tg C yr-1 (19 g C m-2 yr-1) balancing 40% of mean annual C emissions from mainland Norway. Total organic C (TOC) inputs from rivers to coastal areas were 1.1 ± 0.1 Tg C yr-1 (3.3 g C m-2 yr-1), of which half may be buried permanently in coastal sediments representing an additional C sink. Subartic Norway (25% of Norway) contributed <5% to the terrestrial C sink and almost 10% to the riverine C export in Norway. In-lake and in-stream processes resulted in losses of terrestrially fixed DOC as CO2, indicating that headwater TOC export could be between 5 to 7 g C m-2 yr-1. Forests accumulated most C (5.9± 0.4 Tg C yr-1 or 51 g C m-2 yr-1). The present forest sink is primarily a legacy from earlier intense forestry which led to low standing stocks at the start of the 20th century. Compared with forest soils (9 g C m-2 yr-1), C sequestration in peatlands (32 g C m-2 yr-1) was very effective. The largest losses of organic C were from cultivated organic soils (-0.42 ± 0.17 Tg C yr-1; -35 g C m-2 yr-1). All flux estimates are independent and based on highly varying data availability and methods. Cross-validation would add to the credibility of these numbers and their uncertainty. Riverine TOC fluxes and C uptake in biomass were of similar size in subarctic Norway. In boreal, oceanic Norway riverine TOC fluxes were 30% of biomass C uptake. It is unclear whether these riverine C exports (originating in forest soils and peatlands) represent an additional loss for which terrestrial C uptake must be corrected. This is because of the soil model, which conceptualizes the soil C sink as a product of temperature and litter flow. This concept does not include a role for precipitation in soil C accumulation – either by vertical displacement of DOC from topsoil to subsoil or by including lateral losses of C from soils to rivers. Climate predictions indicate more precipitation and higher precipitation intensity, suggesting larger transport from soils to rivers to coastal areas with uncertain implications for the terrestrial C sink. To improve northern landscape C balances a catchment perspective would be valuable, integrating across ecosystems and connecting vertical and lateral C fluxes.