dot
Detailansicht
Katalogkarte GBA
Katalogkarte ISBD
Suche präzisieren
Drucken
Download RIS
Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen
Titel Applicability and limitations of enzyme addition assays for the characterisation of soil organic phosphorus across a range of soil types
VerfasserIn Klaus Jarosch, Ashlea Doolette, Ronald Smernik, Emmanuel Frossard, Else K. Bünemann
Konferenz EGU General Assembly 2014
Medientyp Artikel
Sprache Englisch
Digitales Dokument PDF
Erschienen In: GRA - Volume 16 (2014)
Datensatznummer 250091025
Publikation (Nr.) Volltext-Dokument vorhandenEGU/EGU2014-5290.pdf
 
Zusammenfassung
Solution 31P NMR spectroscopy is a powerful tool for the characterisation and quantification of organic P classes in soil. Potential limitations are due to costs, equipment accessibility and the requirement of relatively large amounts of sample. A recent alternative approach for the quantification of specific organic P classes is the use of substrate-specific phosphohydrolase enzymes which cleave the inorganic orthophosphate from the organic moiety. The released orthophosphate is detectable by colorimetry. Conclusions about the hydrolysed class of organic P can be made based on the comparison of inorganic P concentrations in enzymatically treated and untreated samples. The aim of this study was to test the applicability of enzyme addition assays for the characterisation of organic P classes on a) NaOH-EDTA extracts, b) soil:water filtrates (0.2 μm) and c) soil:water suspensions. The organic P classes in NaOH-EDTA extracts were also determined by 31P NMR spectroscopy, enabling a comparison between methods. Ten topsoil samples from four continents (five cambisols, two ferralsols, two luvisols and one lixisol) with varying total P content (83 – 1,1560 mg kg-1), pHH2O (4.2 – 8.0) and land management (grassland or cropped land) were analysed. Four different classes of organic P were determined by the enzyme addition assay: 1) monoester like-P (by an acid phosphatase known to hydrolyse simple monoesters, pyrophosphate and ATP), 2) DNA-like P (by a nuclease in combination with an acid phosphatase), 3) inositol phosphate-like P (by a phytase known to hydrolyse all monoester like-P plus myo-inositol hexakisphosphate and scyllo-inositol hexakisphosphate) and 4) enzyme stable-P (enzymatically not hydrolysed organic P forms). In the ten topsoil samples, NaOH-EDTA-extractable organic P ranged from 6 – 1,115 mg P kg-1 soil. Of this, 33 – 92 % was enzyme labile, with inositol phosphate-like P being the largest organic P class in most soils (15 – 51%), followed by monoester-like P (10 – 47%) and DNA-like P (0 – 15%). The four soil organic P classes detected by either 31P NMR spectroscopy or enzyme addition assays were well correlated with each other (R2 0.93 – 0.99). In soil:water filtrates, 0.1 – 4.1 mg enzyme-labile P kg-1 soil were detected, which consisted mainly of inositol phosphate-like P. In some soils, a low absolute amount of water-soluble organic P hindered a more detailed characterisation. In soil:water suspensions, enzyme-labile organic P ranged from 4.3 – 12.6 mg P kg-1 soil. However, the enzyme addition assay was only applicable on three soils, since in the other soils i) added enzymes were partly inhibited in soil:water suspensions and ii) the hydrolysis of organic P classes by soil intrinsic enzymes could not be accounted for. In conclusion, enzyme addition assays appear to be a promising approach for a rapid determination of four main soil organic P classes in NaOH-EDTA extracts. Especially the small amount of required sample size (< 1ml) and the relatively simple instrumentation facilitate a rapid and cheap analysis on these extracts. Application of this method is also possible on soil:water filtrates, but low amounts of organic P may hinder detailed analysis. Key words: soil organic phosphorus characterisation, enzyme addition assays, 31P NMR spectroscopy, soil suspensions, soil filtrate