dot
Detailansicht
Katalogkarte GBA
Katalogkarte ISBD
Suche präzisieren
Drucken
Download RIS
Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen
Titel Mineral chemistry and geochemistry of ophiolitic ultramafics from central Eastern Desert, Egypt: A case for contaminated mantle–derived magma
VerfasserIn Abdel-Aal M. Abdel-Karim, Shehata Ali, Shymaa A. El-Safei
Konferenz EGU General Assembly 2017
Medientyp Artikel
Sprache en
Digitales Dokument PDF
Erschienen In: GRA - Volume 19 (2017)
Datensatznummer 250151911
Publikation (Nr.) Volltext-Dokument vorhandenEGU/EGU2017-16680.pdf
 
Zusammenfassung
The ophiolitic ultramafics are widely distributed in the Eastern Desert of Egypt. The present study is focused on two different localities of ophiolitic ultramafics in the central Eastern Desert (CED); Um Halham and Fawakhir. These ultramafic sections consist of serpentinites, serpentinized peridotites together with talc– and quartz–carbonates. Chromite is the most common original magmatic phase recorded in these rocks then olivine and pyroxene. The chemistry of the Al–chromite indicates a temperature of ~500–550 oC consistent with lower amphibolite facies metamorphism. The high Cr# (> 60) of Al–chromites in the studied ultramafics resembles supra–subduction zone (SSZ) peridotites. Moreover, their higher Cr# suggests that they originated from the deeper portion of the mantle section with boninitic affinity. These mantle rocks equilibrated with boninitic melt have been generated by high melting degrees. The estimated melting degrees (~ 19–24 %) of these mantle rocks lie within the range of SSZ peridotites. The Serpentinized peridotite and serpentinites have low Al2O3/SiO2 ratios (mostly < 0.03) similar to fore–arc mantle wedge serpentinites and further indicate that their mantle protolith had experienced partial melting before serpentinization process. The LREE–enriched patterns of the ophiolitic ultramafics arose from crustal contamination of their mantle source but not from melt/rock reaction. A higher mantle contamination by crustal materials and/or subduction–related slab fluids of the CED ophiolites relative to that of the SED ophiolites is also proved.