dot
Detailansicht
Katalogkarte GBA
Katalogkarte ISBD
Suche präzisieren
Drucken
Download RIS
Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen
Titel Effect of changing ice cover on aquatic primary production
VerfasserIn Mohammed Hamdan, Erin Hotchkiss, Jenny Ask, Mohammed Haidery, Pär Byström, Jan Karlsson
Konferenz EGU General Assembly 2017
Medientyp Artikel
Sprache en
Digitales Dokument PDF
Erschienen In: GRA - Volume 19 (2017)
Datensatznummer 250148261
Publikation (Nr.) Volltext-Dokument vorhandenEGU/EGU2017-12501.pdf
 
Zusammenfassung
Effect of changing ice cover on aquatic primary production Abstract: Ice cover is a key feature of many aquatic ecosystems that is expected to change with climate warming. Yet, very little is known about what controls key processes (e.g. gross primary production; GPP) under ice and how that will change with altered ice cover dynamics. Elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations that build up under ice may stimulate GPP as light conditions and nutrients are sufficient. We tested this prediction in a large scale experimental pond ecosystem in northern Sweden where we measured whole-ecosystem GPP from late winter to spring ice break-up in 8 (130 m3) enclosures. In 4 enclosures we manipulated ice cover to simulate earlier ice break-up by 2 weeks; 4 enclosures experienced ambient ice conditions. The effect of ice cover on CO2 and other environmental variables (light, nutrients, temperature) on GPP was measured throughout the season. During the ice cover period with light levels sufficient for photosynthesis, the temporal variability in GPP was positively correlated to CO2 and negatively correlated to light. Before ice cover manipulation, the highest GPP coincided with peak CO2 concentration and the lowest light intensity. On the other hand, the lowest GPP value and CO2 concentration were in the beginning of ice free season with the highest light intensity. The important role of CO2 availability was confirmed by the experimental manipulation of ice coverage, which decreased CO2 concentrations and GPP relative to control enclosures. The results suggest that aquatic GPP responses to changing ice cover during the spring thaw period and can be relatively high and depends on the accumulated CO2 during winter.