![Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen](images/unchecked.gif) |
Titel |
Addressing glacial cycle uncertainty of the Greenland Ice Sheet: model, constraints, and initial results towards Bayesian calibration |
VerfasserIn |
Lev Tarasov, Antony Long, Dave Roberts, Sarah Woodroffe, Glenn Milne, Svend Funder, Kristian Kjeldsen, Benoit Lecavalier |
Konferenz |
EGU General Assembly 2017
|
Medientyp |
Artikel
|
Sprache |
en
|
Digitales Dokument |
PDF |
Erschienen |
In: GRA - Volume 19 (2017) |
Datensatznummer |
250146960
|
Publikation (Nr.) |
EGU/EGU2017-11034.pdf |
|
|
|
Zusammenfassung |
Given the ongoing challenge of missing LGM ice, there is a need to build confident bounds
on paleo contributions from major ice sheets. For approaches based on glaciological models,
such bounds require a model that adequately probes uncertainties in both climate and ice
processes along with a methodology for using paleo-observations to constrain this probe. To
date, paleo glaciological models of the Greenland ice sheet (GrIS) have low confidence in
their derived bounds. This is due in good part to limited probes of model uncertainties and
sole reliance on climate forcings based on glacial indices derived from GRIP or GISPII ice
core records.
We describe the initial constraint data set (and welcome new data), error model for the
data, and model setup in working towards a full Bayesian inversion of the last glacial cycle
GrIS chronology. We use the 3D Glacial Systems Model with coupled glacial isostatic
adjustment (including a first order gravitational correction) and subgrid hypsometric surface
mass balance and ice flow modules. The climate component is distinguished by a
weighting of climate representations, including a fully coupled "climate generator" that
has no dependence on Greenland ice core records. Calibrated model parameters
also account for uncertainties in ice calving and submarine melt, basal drag, deep
geothermal heat flux, and earth viscosity structure. The calibration is currently against
relative sea level observations, constraints on ice extent from cosmogenic dates, and
borehole temperature records from the Greenland ice core sites. Comparison of initial
ensemble results against calibration constraints will validate the extent to which the
model system potentially "covers reality", a pre-requisite for confident Bayesian
inversion. |
|
|
|
|
|