![Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen](images/unchecked.gif) |
Titel |
Decollement controls on pro versus retro wedge deformation in mountain belts |
VerfasserIn |
Arjan Grool, Ritske S. Huismans, Mary Ford |
Konferenz |
EGU General Assembly 2017
|
Medientyp |
Artikel
|
Sprache |
en
|
Digitales Dokument |
PDF |
Erschienen |
In: GRA - Volume 19 (2017) |
Datensatznummer |
250146230
|
Publikation (Nr.) |
EGU/EGU2017-10242.pdf |
|
|
|
Zusammenfassung |
Doubly vergent orogens have a pro-wedge (lower plate) and a retro-wedge (upper plate). Most shortening is accommodated on the pro-wedge while retro-wedge shortening is typically limited. For example, the Eastern Pyrenees have experienced about 145 km of convergence, of which about 125 km (86%) was accommodated in the pro-wedge and about 20 km (14%) in the retro-wedge. Strain partitioning between pro- and retro-wedge is influenced by several factors, some of which have been identified in past work: Extensional inheritance and syn-orogenic sedimentation can help to increase the percentage of total shortening accommodated in the retro-wedge while erosion promotes pro-wedge shortening. We use high-resolution 2D numerical models to investigate factors that control pro- versus retro-wedge shortening. For a total convergence similar to the Eastern Pyrenees, our models predict that variations in extensional inheritance and syn-orogenic sedimentation will result in a maximum of 10% of total shortening being accommodated in the retro-wedge. Here, we investigate the role of 1) the rheology and 2) distribution of a decollement layer.
Our models show that: 1) Decollement rheology has a first order control on strain distribution between the pro- and the retro-wedge. After 145 km of total convergence, a model with a weak frictional (φ=2, shale-like) decollement will only accommodate 9% of total shortening in the retro-wedge. In contrast in models with a weak viscous (μ=1018, salt-like) decollement retro-wedge shortening amounts to 18% and a stronger, but still weak, viscous decollement (μ=1019) leads to 21%. 2) Décollement distribution influences the timing of the first outward propagation of thick-skinned deformation in the retro-wedge. In the Eastern Pyrenees, thick-skinned deformation propagated out into the retro-wedge within 145 km of total convergence. In models with a decollement on both sides of the orogen this only occurred after 240 km. If, as in the Eastern Pyrenees, the decollement is missing in the model’s retro-wedge, the required convergence would be reduced to 180 km.
Assuming deformation localizes along the path of least resistance, meaning a force balance exists between the pro- and retro-wedge, anything that changes the force required to deform one side of the orogen will have direct consequences for the other side as the strain distribution adjusts. In our models a viscous decollement enables the sedimentary cover of the pro-wedge to be transported into the pro-foredeep, increasing the force required for pro-wedge frontal accretion and thus promoting shortening in the retro-wedge. In models with no decollement in the retro-wedge, higher friction along existing crustal shear zones will accelerate formation of a new, more external shear zone. This mechanism alone cannot explain frontal accretion in the retro-wedge after only 145 km of convergence, meaning other factors such as more pre-existing extensional shear zones may also play a role in the Eastern Pyrenees. |
|
|
|
|
|