dot
Detailansicht
Katalogkarte GBA
Katalogkarte ISBD
Suche präzisieren
Drucken
Download RIS
Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen
Titel Soil CO2 emission of different ecosystems and soil microbial community respiration (European Russia)
VerfasserIn Sofia Sushko, Nadezhda Ananyeva, Kristina Ivashchenko, Vyacheslav Vasenev
Konferenz EGU General Assembly 2017
Medientyp Artikel
Sprache en
Digitales Dokument PDF
Erschienen In: GRA - Volume 19 (2017)
Datensatznummer 250139123
Publikation (Nr.) Volltext-Dokument vorhandenEGU/EGU2017-2301.pdf
 
Zusammenfassung
Soil CO2 emission is mainly provided by soil microorganisms and plant roots respiration. Our study focuses on finding a relationship between soil CO2 emission of different ecosystems and soil microbial community functioning. Soil CO2 emission was monthly measured (LI-820) from May to October 2015 in the 5-th spatially distributed points of forest, meadow (steppe), arable (bare fallow), urban of subtaiga and forest-steppe vegetation subzones (Albeluvisol and Chernozems, Moscow and Kursk regions, respectively). Soil microbial biomass carbon (Cmic, substrate-induced respiration method), basal respiration (BR), organic carbon content (Corg), pHw and soil C/N ratio were measured in soil samples (0-10 cm, litter excluded, n = 240). Specific respiration of soil microbial biomass (qCO2) was calculated as BR / Cmic. Soil CO2 emission of different ecosystems was ranged 0.2-87.4 and 1.1-87.9 g CO2 m−2 d−1 for subtaiga and forest-steppe, respectively. It was reached on average 20.5, 33.5, 3.8, 28.4 and 15.0, 23.8, 3.7, 15.3 g CO2 m−2 d−1 for forest, meadow, arable, urban of subtaiga and forest-steppe, respectively. The high soil CO2 emission was found in grassland ecosystems, the low – in arable, however it was quite high in urban. Soil organic carbon content of different ecosystems was ranged 1.0-3.3% and 1.4-3.7%, pH was 4.7-7.6 and 6.1-8.2, C/N = 10.8-16.0 and 12.0-18.1 for subtaiga and forest-steppe, respectively. Soil Cmic of different ecosystems was ranged 60-1294 and 178-2531 μg C g−1 for subtaiga and forest-steppe, respectively. The Cmic of forest, meadow, arable, urban in subtaiga and forest-steppe was reached on average 331, 549, 110, 517 and 1525, 1430, 320, 482 μg C g−1, respectively. Soil BR of different ecosystems was ranged 0.14-2.23 and 0.15-2.80 μg C-CO2 g−1 h−1 for subtaiga and forest-steppe, respectively. Moreover, the BR of forest, meadow, arable, urban in subtaiga and forest-steppe was on average 0.87, 0.92, 0.42, 0.47 and 1.20, 1.42, 0.33, 0.64 μg C-CO2 g−1 h−1, respectively. The qCO2 value was ranged 0.55-8.22 and 0.39-2.64 μg C-CO2 mg−1 Cmic h−1 for subtaiga and forest-steppe, respectively. The qCO2 of forest, meadow, arable, urban in subtaiga and forest-steppe was on average 3.12, 1.86, 3.84, 0.95 and 0.83, 1.03, 1.08, 1.45 μg C-CO2 mg−1 Cmic h−1, respectively. Soil CO2 emission of subtaiga different ecosystems was correlated with Corg, Cmic and qCO2 (r = 0.60, 0.59 and -0.64, respectively, p <0.01) and its spatial-temporal variability was explained by 35 and 41% of Cmic and qCO2 (p <<0.001), respectively. However, soil CO2 emission of forest-steppe was correlated only with BR (r = 0.57, p <0.01), this was explained by 33% of emission’s variation (p <<0.001). Thus, soil CO2 emission in subtaiga different ecosystems might be predicted by Cmic, and in forest-steppe it was by BR. Current research was partially sponsored by RFBR grants Nos. 15-04-00915 and 15-34-00398; Russian Academy Program “Biodiversity” No. 29.