 |
| Titel |
The Internet of Scientific Research Things |
| VerfasserIn |
Cynthia Chandler, Adam Shepherd, Robert Arko, Adam Leadbetter, Robert Groman, Danie Kinkade, Shannon Rauch, Molly Allison, Nancy Copley, Stephen Gegg, Peter Wiebe, David Glover |
| Konferenz |
EGU General Assembly 2016
|
| Medientyp |
Artikel
|
| Sprache |
en
|
| Digitales Dokument |
PDF |
| Erschienen |
In: GRA - Volume 18 (2016) |
| Datensatznummer |
250136703
|
| Publikation (Nr.) |
 EGU/EGU2016-17804.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
| Zusammenfassung |
| The sum of the parts is greater than the whole, but for scientific research how do we identify the parts when they are curated at distributed locations? Results from environmental research represent an enormous investment and constitute essential knowledge required to understand our planet in this time of rapid change. The Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) curates data from US NSF Ocean Sciences funded research awards, but BCO-DMO is only one repository in a landscape that includes many other sites that carefully curate results of scientific research. Recent efforts to use persistent identifiers (PIDs), most notably Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCiD) for person, Digital Object Identifier (DOI) for publications including data sets, and Open Funder Registry (FundRef) codes for research grants and awards are realizing success in unambiguously identifying the pieces that represent results of environmental research. This presentation uses BCO-DMO as a test case for adding PIDs to the locally-curated information published out as standards compliant metadata records. We present a summary of progress made thus far; what has worked and why, and thoughts on logical next steps. |
|
|
|
|
|
|