dot
Detailansicht
Katalogkarte GBA
Katalogkarte ISBD
Suche präzisieren
Drucken
Download RIS
Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen
Titel Can laboratory data explain field observations: The fluxes of HNO3 and HNO4 from snow in the lab and in Antarctica
VerfasserIn Thorsten Bartels-Rausch
Konferenz EGU General Assembly 2015
Medientyp Artikel
Sprache Englisch
Digitales Dokument PDF
Erschienen In: GRA - Volume 17 (2015)
Datensatznummer 250114561
Publikation (Nr.) Volltext-Dokument vorhandenEGU/EGU2015-15350.pdf
 
Zusammenfassung
Fluxes of trace gases between Polar snow packs and the boundary layer air are of importance because they significantly impact the composition and reactivity of the lower atmosphere and of the snow pack. They thus need to be understood to predict the oxidative capacity of the atmosphere on a regional scale and to interpret ice core data for reconstruction of past environmental conditions. A full understanding of observed fluxes is however complicated by the variety of underlying, elemental processes that may drive the fluxes synchronously: chemical reactions; diffusion in the gas, solid, or liquid phase; adsorption or desorption; or by uptake to the bulk ice. In recent decades, some of these processes have been carefully investigated in laboratory-based experiments. Here, I will present our recent results on the partitioning of HNO4 between snow and air. These results are the first acquired at relevant low concentrations and show a significant lower tendency of HNO4 to stick to snow than previously thought. Fluxes of HNO4 in polar environments are not only of importance because HNO4 is a reservoir for HOx and NOx; but also suspected to lead to interferences in HONO measurements. A key question with this -and similar laboratory measurements- is, how well the description of physical processes derived under the idealized laboratory conditions can be applied to complex environmental settings. A data set published this summer on gas phase concentrations of HNO4 and of HNO3 in costal Antarctica during winter gives the first and unique opportunity to show how well the agreement between laboratory and field investigation is. The authors of the field study have carefully selected specific days from their data set where photochemistry and ventilation by wind is absent. They hypothise and show that only ad- and desorption from the snow can explain the observed gas-phase concentrations. Here, I go a significant step further and support the author’s conclusion by discussing the equilibrium partitioning of HNO3 and HNO4 that one would expect based on selected laboratory data. Both, adsorption to the surface of the snow and uptake to the bulk forming a solid solution are discussed (HNO3 only). Further, I address the question, if the snow holds enough HNO3 and HNO4 at its surface or in its bulk (HNO3 only) to fuel the observed emissions. Thus both equilibrium conditions and molecular flux budgets are discussed. These calculations show that adsorption/desorption can indeed explain the observed mixing ratio in the Antarctic boundary layer. Release from a solid solution seems to be too slow. Jones, A. E., Brough, N., Anderson, P. S., & Wolff, E. W. (2014). HO2NO2 and HNO3 in the coastal Antarctic winter night: a “lab-in-the-field” experiment. Acpd, 14(9), 12771–12796. Interactive comment on “HO2NO2 and HNO3 in the coastal Antarctic winter night: a “lab-in-the-field” experiment” by A. E. Jones et al. , T. Bartels-Rausch thorsten.bartels-rausch@psi.ch Received and published: 11 July 2014 Legrand, M., Preunkert, S., Frey, M., Bartels-Rausch, T., Kukui, A., King, M. D., et al. (2014). Large mixing ratios of atmospheric nitrous acid (HONO) at Concordia (East Antarctic plateau) in summer: a strong source from surface snow? Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 14(8), 11749–11785. doi:10.5194/acpd-14-11749-2014 Ulrich, T., Ammann, M., Leutwyler, S., & Bartels-Rausch, T. (2012). The adsorption of peroxynitric acid on ice between 230 K and 253 K. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 12(4), 1833–1845. doi:10.5194/acp-12-1833-2012