dot
Detailansicht
Katalogkarte GBA
Katalogkarte ISBD
Suche präzisieren
Drucken
Download RIS
Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen
Titel Seismic resolution of lowermost mantle structure
VerfasserIn Stefanie Hempel, Christine Thomas, Tarje Nissen-Meyer
Konferenz EGU General Assembly 2015
Medientyp Artikel
Sprache Englisch
Digitales Dokument PDF
Erschienen In: GRA - Volume 17 (2015)
Datensatznummer 250110525
Publikation (Nr.) Volltext-Dokument vorhandenEGU/EGU2015-10529.pdf
 
Zusammenfassung
We use the axisymmetric, spherical Earth spectral elements code AxiSEM to model seismic compressional waves which sample laterally varying lowermost mantle structures. Synthetic seismograms with dominant periods between 1 and 16 seconds are computed for approximately 1500 models of D'' heterogeneities varying in thickness, lateral wavelength, topographic behaviour and elastic properties. We use high-resolution array seismological stacking techniques to process the synthetic data. Our study shows, that the position of the reflector inferred from 1D backprojecting techniques as used in previous studies is overestimated with increasing inclination of the slope of the structure, whereas undulating reflectors are underestimated in height. For models with D'' topography we find D'' discontinuity reflections in only a small subset of stacks, but an apparent topography of the CMB. Various factors such as very thick or very thin D'' layers, strong topography, convex curvature of the reflector towards the seismic source lead to invisibility of the D'' reflector in most cases. Our study also reveals, that amplitude studies lead to highly ambiguous information due to the multiple dependencies of the amplitude. The thickness of seismic velocity gradients was previously underestimated, leaving wider gradients possible to be delected. Our observations in synthetic seismograms explain the intermittence of D'' observations, as well as enable us to discuss accuracy of array seismological observations. Thus, seismic observations can more reliably be used to support or exclude possible mineralphysical or geodynamical interpretations.