dot
Detailansicht
Katalogkarte GBA
Katalogkarte ISBD
Suche präzisieren
Drucken
Download RIS
Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen
Titel Why Do Analytical Snow Models Succeed? Why Do They Fail?
VerfasserIn Ross Woods
Konferenz EGU General Assembly 2015
Medientyp Artikel
Sprache Englisch
Digitales Dokument PDF
Erschienen In: GRA - Volume 17 (2015)
Datensatznummer 250110345
Publikation (Nr.) Volltext-Dokument vorhandenEGU/EGU2015-10328.pdf
 
Zusammenfassung
Seasonal snowpack storage exerts a major influence on water resources for millions of people; these snowpacks are currently changing, and are expected to change further in response to climate changes. Analytical models of snowpack storage are one possible technique for improving our understanding of the sensitivity of snowpacks to changes in climate. Such models have the benefit of being parsimonious and easily understood, but they rely on very strong assumptions which may not be valid. A previous study (Woods, 2009, Advances in Water Resources) indicated that an analytical model was able to capture the long-term average seasonal accumulation and melt of the snowpack in 6 widely differing sites in the western USA. Here I report on further tests using a large sample of snow data (more than 700 stations in the USA’s SNOTEL network) which expose some weaknesses in the model, though these do not appear sufficiently systematic to completely reject the model. However, the model fails comprehensively when used in a semi-distributed application to predict the seasonal snowmelt pulse in streamflow records of 100 snow-dominated catchments from the MOPEX data set. Finally, I will report on an investigation of several of the assumptions underlying the analytical model (e.g. deterministic climate inputs, temperature-index method, universal values of model parameters), to determine the dominant causes of model failure, and propose alternative formulations and appropriate hypothesis tests.