![Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen](images/unchecked.gif) |
Titel |
More evidence that anaerobic oxidation of methane is prevalent in soils: Is it time to upgrade our models? |
VerfasserIn |
Mathieu Gauthier, Robert Bradley, Miloslav Šimek |
Konferenz |
EGU General Assembly 2015
|
Medientyp |
Artikel
|
Sprache |
Englisch
|
Digitales Dokument |
PDF |
Erschienen |
In: GRA - Volume 17 (2015) |
Datensatznummer |
250101451
|
Publikation (Nr.) |
EGU/EGU2015-594.pdf |
|
|
|
Zusammenfassung |
Estimating future fluxes of CH4 between land and atmosphere requires well-conceived
process-based biogeochemical models. Current models do not represent the anaerobic
oxidation of me-thane (AOM) in land surface soils, in spite of increasing evidence that this
process is widespread. Our objective was to determine whether AOM, or potential AOM,
commonly occurs in 20 hydromorphic soils spanning a wide range of chemical properties.
Bulk soil samples were collected under shallow water near the shoreline of 15 recently
drained fish ponds in southern Bohemia (Czech Republic), as well as from below the water
table at 3 peatland locations in northeast Scotland and 2 acid sulfate soils on the
southern coast of Finland. Each soil slurry was incubated under both oxic and anoxic
conditions, with or without the addition of alternative electron acceptors (SO42-
and NO3-) or H2PO4-. Here, “oxic” and “anoxic” conditions refer to anoxic soil
respectively incubated in the presence of air or argon. Using the isotope dilution
method, we determined the gross production and oxidation rates of CH4 after 2 days
incubation under oxic conditions, and after 2, 21 and 60 days incubation under
anoxic conditions. Large differences in net CH4 fluxes were observed between soil
types and between incubation conditions. AOM was detected in each of the 20 bulk
soil samples, which spanned >6 pH units and 2 orders of magnitude in organic C
content. Significant positive relationships were found between AOM and gross CH4
production rates under anoxic conditions, resulting in AOM rates that were sometimes
higher than CH4 oxidation rates under oxic conditions. There was no relationship
between net and gross CH4 production rates, such that 2 soil types could display
similar low net rates, yet conceal very large differences in gross rates. The effects
of alternative electron acceptors on AOM were idiosyncratic and resulted in no
net trend. We did find, however, a negative effect of SO42- and H2PO4- on gross
CH4 production rates under anoxic and oxic conditions respectively. Under oxic
conditions, CH4 oxidation was related to soil organic C content. Taken collectively, our
results suggest that AOM, or potential AOM, is prevalent over a wide range of soil
types, that AOM may contribute substantially to CH4 oxidation in soils, and that
AOM in soils should be integrated to current process-based CH4 cycling models. |
|
|
|
|
|