dot
Detailansicht
Katalogkarte GBA
Katalogkarte ISBD
Suche präzisieren
Drucken
Download RIS
Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen
Titel Tropospheric chlorine isotope measurements in CFC-11, CFC-12 and CFC-113
VerfasserIn Sam Allin, Jan Kaiser, Johannes Laube, Bill Sturges
Konferenz EGU General Assembly 2014
Medientyp Artikel
Sprache Englisch
Digitales Dokument PDF
Erschienen In: GRA - Volume 16 (2014)
Datensatznummer 250100812
Publikation (Nr.) Volltext-Dokument vorhandenEGU/EGU2014-16811.pdf
 
Zusammenfassung
In 2010, we reported the first measurements of chlorine isotope fractionation in stratospheric dichlorodifluoromethane (CF2Cl2, CFC-12) (Laube et al., Science 329:1167, 2010). We found an increase in the isotope delta, δ(37Cl), with altitude and a tight correlation between ln[1 + δ(37Cl)] and ln(mixing ratio). The derived apparent isotope fractionation was εapp = (-12 ± 2) o. The stratospheric isotopic fractionation should lead to a continuous increase of the tropospheric chlorine isotope delta while CFC-12 is still emitted into the atmosphere. Provided the source signature has not changed, we predict a 2.5 to 3 o increase since when CFC emissions started in the 1930s until 2010, with the strongest increase in recent years (about 1 o per decade since the mid-1990s). We have now measured the chlorine isotope delta of CFC-12 as well as CFC-11 (trichlorofluoromethane, CFCl3) and CFC-113 (1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane, C2F3Cl3) in the Cape Grim Air Archive (1978 to 2010) and Arctic (NEEM, Greenland) and Antarctic firn samples (Fletcher, West Antarctica). The deepest firn samples include a significant proportion of older air from before 1978. The repeatability for individual samples was ±2.6o for CFC-12 and ±2.7o for CFC-11 and ±3.7o for CFC-113. The results show no significant trends in δ(37Cl) over the whole time period; however, there is a small positive trend for the latter period of the samples of (0.3 ± 0.1) o per decade for CFC-12 since 1997, which explains at third of the predicted trend. The discrepancy between observed and predicted trends may be due to offsetting changes in the source isotope signature: If the there was decrease in the isotope delta of the emissions over time, this would reduce the predicted increase caused by downward transport of 37Cl-enriched stratospheric air.