![Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen](images/unchecked.gif) |
Titel |
DMO processing on the Ketzin 3D seismic data |
VerfasserIn |
Fei Huang, Christopher Juhlin, Monika Ivandic, Fengjiao Zhang |
Konferenz |
EGU General Assembly 2014
|
Medientyp |
Artikel
|
Sprache |
Englisch
|
Digitales Dokument |
PDF |
Erschienen |
In: GRA - Volume 16 (2014) |
Datensatznummer |
250088082
|
Publikation (Nr.) |
EGU/EGU2014-2157.pdf |
|
|
|
Zusammenfassung |
The Dip-moveout (DMO) correction is a process which attempts to make the finite offset data
closer to zero offset data after the normal-moveout (NMO) correction. The NMO correction
is then dip independent and reflections with different dips will stack coherently. DMO plays a
critical role in seismic processing by enhancing the final image quality of the seismic
data.
In this study, we apply 3D Squeezing DMO (Hale and Artley, 1993) to seismic data from
the Ketzin pilot CO2 site after NMO to study the impact of DMO on time-lapse seismic
imaging and to investigate if it enhances the CO2 seismic monitoring technique. This 3D
DMO method is based on an integral approach and incorporates Hale and Artley’s (1993)
modifications for variable velocity with time. A constant velocity algorithm is used with a
gamma correction function which depends on the velocity function. An anti-alias
velocity of 3000 m/s is used for the DMO. After DMO the data are stacked and F-XY
deconvolution is applied. Finally, 3D finite-difference migration using the final
smoothed NMO velocities is performed for each data set. We then apply a time-lapse
analysis to the 3D seismic data sets and compare the results with and without DMO
processing.
The most important aspect of the DMO processing is determining the velocity field for
the NMO step. This is done by using the initial smoothed velocity field obtained from the
conventional velocity analysis before DMO as a first estimate. The data are input into the
DMO process and then inverse NMO is applied. These data are then subjected to a new
velocity analysis and the velocity field is updated and used as input for the NMO process. A
number of iterations are generally required until the velocity field does not need further
updating. In this study velocities were picked at every 20th CDP in the inline and crossline
directions.
Compared to the velocity spectrum without DMO processing, the velocity trend is
improved and the ambiguity in the velocity picks is eliminated after DMO correction. The
improved accuracy of velocity picking makes it easier to interpret the velocity spectrum and
obtain correct interval velocities. Considering the stacked section, DMO suppresses the
random noise to a greater extent and thus the signal-to-noise ratio is enhanced.
From the comparison of the amplitude difference horizon at the reservoir level, the
shape of the anomaly observed in the data with DMO processing is similar to that
observed in the data without DMO processing. However, the amplitude anomalies of
the former are stronger than those of the latter, especially close to the injection
well. In addition, one stronger amplitude anomaly in the DMO time-lapse horizon
indicates a preferred trend of the CO2 migration in WNW direction due to the reservoir
heterogeneity.
Hale, D. and Artley, C. [1993] Squeezing dip moveout for depth-variable velocity.
Geophysics, 58(2), 257-264. |
|
|
|
|
|