dot
Detailansicht
Katalogkarte GBA
Katalogkarte ISBD
Suche präzisieren
Drucken
Download RIS
Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen
Titel Amphibole zonation as a tool for tracing metamorphic histories: examples from Lavrion and Penteli metamorphic core complexes
VerfasserIn Ioannis Baziotis, Alexander Proyer, Evripides Mposkos, Antonios Marsellos, George Leontakianakos
Konferenz EGU General Assembly 2014
Medientyp Artikel
Sprache Englisch
Digitales Dokument PDF
Erschienen In: GRA - Volume 16 (2014)
Datensatznummer 250086892
Publikation (Nr.) Volltext-Dokument vorhandenEGU/EGU2014-835.pdf
 
Zusammenfassung
The amphiboles represent the predominant minerals in high pressure/low temperature metamafic rocks. Amphibole composition (e.g. cations Si, Al, Na) depends on the bulk composition, the solid solution‘s gaps and the P-T conditions during metamorphism. The AlIV , NaA and Ti increase with temperature, whereas AlV I and NaB with pressure (Triboulet, 1992). Increase of Si+4 and decrease of AlV I and (NaA+NaB) in clinoamphibole is concurrent with pressure decrease. We focus on Na- and Ca-amphiboles from greenschists and blueschists from Lavrion (upper tectonic unit-UTU) and Penteli (lower tectonic unit-LTU) metamorphic complexes (Baziotis et al. 2009; Baziotis & Mposkos, 2011) in order to unravel the relation of zonation with: (1) the physicochemical conditions and (2) the P-T stages during metamorphic evolution. Amphiboles in Lavrion metabasites are the dominant rock constituents: (ferro)-glaucophane in the blueschists and actinolite in the greenschists. Blue-amphiboles occur in various textural modes: parallel to the foliation, replacing omphacite, rimmed by Ca-amphibole, as inclusions in albite and epidote or in calcitic veinlets. The blue-amphibole composition varies from glaucophane to ferro-glaucophane with the NaB ranging from 1.617 to 1.979 a.p.f.u., whereas the green-amphiboles are actinolites. In the blueschists, actinolite has higher R3+ at a given NaB compared to the greenschists, attributed to Fe+3-rich bulk composition of the blueschists. Three types of zoning were observed in these amphiboles: glaucophane rimming actinolite, glaucophane with increasing AlIV , AlV I and NaB values towards the rim, and actinolite mantling glaucophane. The zoning patterns in the blue-amphiboles are characterized by increasing Tschermak and glaucophane components towards the rim, consistent with increasing temperature and pressure during prograde metamorphism. Two different modes of actinolite represent different stages of the metamorphic history. The actinolite inclusions formed during prograde evolution, whereas the actinolite overgrowths on glaucophane took place at post-peak conditions, during greenschist-facies overprinting. The actinolite overgrowths indicate retrogression at slightly higher temperature for a given pressure compared to the prograde path; such overgrowths started with the assemblage actinolite–glaucophane–epidote–albite, immediately at the post-peak pressure conditions with minor fluid ingress. In the greenschists, however, the extensive actinolite overgrowths on glaucophane took place in the typical greenschist-facies actinolite–chlorite–epidote–albite stability field, triggered by internal dehydration. The metamorphic history of Penteli amphiboles is depicted by a prograde path with AlV I/ NaB increase and AlIV decrease; this suggests the formation of glaucophane around actinolite during ongoing subduction. Glaucophane replacement by actinolitic hornblende and core-to-rim decrease of AlV I both suggest temperature increase during decompression. A complex amphibole, with Fe-rich hornblende or actinolitic hornblende at the core, an intermediate Na–amphibole and outer rim of actinolitic or actinolitic hornblende, suggest with pressure-temperature decrease. A patchy glaucophane grown at the outer rim, suggests another cycle of pressure increase, perhaps during renewed subduction. This might be interpreted as a temporary recapturing of that rock fragment by the downgoing slab. References Baziotis, I. et al. 2009. Eur. J. Mineral. 21, 133–148. Baziotis, I. & Mposkos, E. 2011. Lithos, 126, 161-173. Triboulet, C. 1992. J. Met. Geol., 10, 545-556.