 |
| Titel |
Quantifying Paris CO2 urban dome: a first synthesis of results from the CO2-Megaparis project (2009-2013) |
| VerfasserIn |
Irène Xuéref-Rémy, Elsa Dieudonné, Lamia Ammoura, Pierre Cellier, Fabien Gibert, Christine Lac, Thomas Lauvaux, Morgan Lopez, Sandip Pal, Olivier Perrussel, Vincent Puygrenier, Michel Ramonet, Martina Schmidt, Balendra Thiruchittampalam, Cyrille Vuillemin |
| Konferenz |
EGU General Assembly 2013
|
| Medientyp |
Artikel
|
| Sprache |
Englisch
|
| Digitales Dokument |
PDF |
| Erschienen |
In: GRA - Volume 15 (2013) |
| Datensatznummer |
250076378
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Zusammenfassung |
| About 80% of global CO2 emissions come from punctual sources such as megacities. Among those, Paris is the third megacity in Europe. However, the estimates of urban CO2 emissions are based on activity proxies and benchmarked emission factors, leading to uncertainties as high as several tenths of percents in some sectors of bottom-up CO2 emissions inventories. Since 2009, the CO2-Megaparis project aims to quantify CO2 emissions from Paris using a top-down approach based on a synergy between atmospheric observations and modeling. A mini-network of 3 stations was developed by LSCE in Paris agglomeration within the infrastructure of the air quality monitoring agency of Paris region, AIRPARIF, completing 2 other stations from the ICOS network leaded at LSCE. The mean CO2 concentration dome over Paris in the mid-afternoon over 1 year of data is about 2.2 ppm, and is strongly wind speed and direction dependent. Analysis of correlations between CO2, CO and 14C02 was carried out and a comparison to available inventories will be presented. Direct modeling of CO2 at a very fine resolution (2x2 km2, 1h) was performed by CNRM and matched well with observations. Results from inverse modeling will be presented. Furthermore, we conducted a campaign using lidar facilities showing that due to the effect of the urban heat island, the boundary layer height (a key parameter in assessing CO2 fluxes from the atmospheric approach) is 10 to 40% time higher in Paris than in surrounding rural areas. Also, a sonic anemometer and a 10 Hz CO2 analyzer were deployed to assess CO2 fluxes from observations, as well as CO2 flux analyzers on crops. Using the data from this instrumentation, a mass balance calculation was carried out and allowed the identification and quantification of Paris CO2 traffic plume to a rural region, about 100 km south of Paris, that matched well with inventories. Finally, an attempt of defining the strengths and weaknesses of the atmospheric approach to quantify urban CO2 emissions will be presented. |
|
|
|
|
|
|