dot
Detailansicht
Katalogkarte GBA
Katalogkarte ISBD
Suche präzisieren
Drucken
Download RIS
Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen
Titel Intercomparison of MAXDOAS HCHO slant columns during the CINDI campaign
VerfasserIn G. Pinardi, C. Adams, S. Beirle, A. Cede, U. Frieß, M. Gil, H. Irie, E. Peters, A. Piters, O. Puentedura, A. Richter, R. Shaigan, E. Spinei, K. Strong, H. Takashima, T. Wagner, F. Wittrock, S. Yilmaz, M. Van Roozendael
Konferenz EGU General Assembly 2012
Medientyp Artikel
Sprache Englisch
Digitales Dokument PDF
Erschienen In: GRA - Volume 14 (2012)
Datensatznummer 250063558
 
Zusammenfassung
We present the results of a formaldehyde slant column intercomparison performed during the Cabauw Intercomparison Campaign of Nitrogen Dioxide measuring Instruments (CINDI) which took place in Cabauw (52°N, 5°E), The Netherlands, during summer 2009. Results from nine MAX-DOAS instruments (from BIRA-IASB, INTA, Bremen, Heidelberg, JAMSTEC, NASA, WSU, Toronto and Mainz research groups) are compared after application of common DOAS settings. To reduce instrumental and atmospheric noises, the slant columns are averaged over intervals of 30-minutes, and subsequently compared to a reference dataset. The intercomparison shows a good agreement, with differences from the reference dataset generally within 15% for off-axis elevations. In a second part of the study, sensitivity tests are performed to investigate the systematic uncertainties in the HCHO slant columns retrieval. Input parameters such as the molecular absorption cross-sections, corrections terms for the Ring effect, the polynomial closure terms and the width of the fitting interval are tested. In general, HCHO slant columns were found to be moderately sensitive to changes in the retrieval settings. However larger differences exceeding 15-20% were found to be related to uncertainties on the Ring effect corrections as well as to the O4 absorption cross-sections. The contribution from random uncertainties (ranging between 5 and 30% of the total error) was found to be highly dependent on the performance of individual measuring systems.