![Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen](images/unchecked.gif) |
Titel |
Observed and simulated seasonal variability of the AMOC at 26°N and 41°N |
VerfasserIn |
C. Mielke, E. Frajka-Williams, J. Baehr |
Konferenz |
EGU General Assembly 2012
|
Medientyp |
Artikel
|
Sprache |
Englisch
|
Digitales Dokument |
PDF |
Erschienen |
In: GRA - Volume 14 (2012) |
Datensatznummer |
250062875
|
|
|
|
Zusammenfassung |
Timeseries of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning (AMOC) have recently become available,
but so far no meridional coherence has been documented in these timeseries. Here, we
analyze the 26°N RAPID and the 41°N ARGO-based AMOC observations (Cunningham et
al., 2007; Willis, 2010) for meridional coherence at seasonal timescales. We use monthly
values smoothed by a three month running mean for both timeseries. At present, the 26°N
RAPID array is available for five years (04/04 – 06/09) and the 41°N data are available for
eight years (01/02 – 09/10).
With no obvious relation between the two latitudes, the AMOC and Ekman transport
timeseries are dominated by the annual cycle at 26°N and 41°N. However, after subtracting
the Ekman transport from the AMOC, we find an inverse seasonal phasing between
AMOC–Ekman at 26°N and 41°N. The mean annual cycle of AMOC–Ekman shows a
maximum in October and a minimum in March at 26°N, but a maximum in April and a
minimum in December at 41°N. We also find this inversely seasonal cycle in the Sverdrup
transports calculated from the zonal integral of the wind stress curl using the NCEP
reanalysis at both latitudes.
We compare our results to a simulation with the high resolution NCEP-forced ocean
simulation from the STORM project. We analyze the period that overlaps with the AMOC
observations (01/02–12/10). The horizontal resolution of the model is about 10km, and the
daily model output is smoothed to three month running means. In the STORM run, we also
find inversely phased seasonal cycles in the Sverdrup transports between 26°N and 41°N, and
no obvious relation between the Ekman transports. However, for AMOC–Ekman, we find
a positive correlation of the 26°N and 41°N timeseries, with the mean seasonal
cycles having a maximum in October and a minimum in March and April at both
latitudes.
A direct comparison shows that the Ekman and Sverdrup transport agree between the model
and the observations both at 26°N and at 41°N. For the total AMOC at 26°N, model and
observations agree well, whereas for the total AMOC at 41°N, the observational
mean seasonal cycle has its maximum in April and the model mean seasonal cycle
shows a maximum in October. While further studies are required, our preliminary
results suggest a meridionally coherent seasonal cycle in the AMOC, and in turn
(potentially) meridionally coherent AMOC variability even at seasonal timescales. |
|
|
|
|
|