![Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen](images/unchecked.gif) |
Titel |
Footprint of the AMOC in future temperature change as simulated by CMIP3 and CMIP5 model ensembles. |
VerfasserIn |
S. S. Drijfhout, G.-J. van Oldenborgh, A. A. Cimatoribus |
Konferenz |
EGU General Assembly 2012
|
Medientyp |
Artikel
|
Sprache |
Englisch
|
Digitales Dokument |
PDF |
Erschienen |
In: GRA - Volume 14 (2012) |
Datensatznummer |
250060916
|
|
|
|
Zusammenfassung |
Performing a regression of surface air temperature on global mean temperature reveals the
temperature pattern associated with climate change. This pattern can be obtained from
observations by use of datasets from GISS, HCMO/CRU and NOAA. A similar pattern can
be obtained from model estimates, combining historical runs and future scenario runs. Here,
we compare runs from the CMIP3 ensemble, where the historical runs are extended with the
A1B scenario, and from the CMIP5 ensemble where the historical runs are extended with the
RCP8.5 scenario. The footprints of temperature change associated with global temperature
rise thus obtained show broad similarities, but also marked model biases. Here, we investigate
whether part of the model bias may be attributed to the response of the AMOC to
global temperature rise. This response features a large model spread, and as a result,
large uncertainty in its projection on the global temperature field. To this end a
bivariate regression of surface temperature to both global mean temperature and an
AMOC index has been performed for the CMIP3 and CMIP5 model ensembles.
The footprint of global mean temperature rise is now separated in a more purely
radiative-forced pattern, void of the cold spot in the North Atlantic, and an AMOC-associated
footprint, not unlike the AMO pattern. Assuming that this pattern is realistically
simulated by the model ensembles allows for an inverse estimate of the AMOC-decline
projected on the observed pattern of surface temperature change. This provides us
with a powerful metric to validate the AMOC response in coupled climate models. |
|
|
|
|
|