|
Titel |
Preliminary aftershock distributions of the 27 February 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule Earthquake from International Aftershock Survey data |
VerfasserIn |
Dietrich Lange, Frederik Tilmann, Susan Beck, Andreas Rietbrock, Jean-Pierre Vilotte, Sergio Barrientos, Diana Comte, Klaus Bataille, Pascal Methe |
Konferenz |
EGU General Assembly 2011
|
Medientyp |
Artikel
|
Sprache |
Englisch
|
Digitales Dokument |
PDF |
Erschienen |
In: GRA - Volume 13 (2011) |
Datensatznummer |
250057301
|
|
|
|
Zusammenfassung |
On 27 February 2010 the Mw 8.8 Maule earthquake in Central Chile ruptured a well known
seismic gap, which last broke in 1835. Shortly after the mainshock, Chilean agencies (UC
Santiago, UC Concepción) and the international seismological community (USA (IRIS),
France (IPGP), UK (University of Liverpool), Germany (GFZ)) installed a total of 142
portable seismic stations along the whole rupture zone in order to capture the aftershock
activity. Most stations were in the field until September 2010, with a subset remaining until
January 2011; the UK stations will remain in the field beyond this time. The data from the
initial deployment are open and are being distributed through the IRIS and GEOFON data
centres. We will present preliminary aftershock distributions based on automatic detection
algorithms. In total, for the period between March and September 2010 we detected
~60,000 locatable earthquakes, of which we form a subset of ~7,000 events with high
quality locations. The depth of events in the high quality subset is generally well
constrained such that the plate interface is clearly defined, and can be separated from
overriding plate seismicity. First order features that can be identified are: 1.) A
pronounced cluster of seismicity is apparent at 25-35 km depth and 50-120 km
perpendicular distance from the trench (with some NS variation). 2.) A secondary band of
seismicity can be identified at 40-50 km depth and ~150-160 km perpendicular
trench distance and between 34° and 37°S. Although the secondary band lies along
the continuation of the primary one, it is clearly separated from it by a gap with
sparse seismicity. 3.) Intense crustal seismicity is found in the region of Pichilemu.
This region hosted the strongest aftershock (Mw=6.9), a normal faulting event
with NW strike. The aftershocks extend from the plate interface to the surface and
are aligned on a NNW-SSE oriented band in map view. 4.) An isolated shallow
cluster of crustal seismicity occurs beneath the volcanic arc (36.42°S, 71.1°W)
near Laguna del Dial. Ongoing research is concerned with calculating first motion
focal mechanisms for the larger events and improving locations by relative location
methods. |
|
|
|
|
|