dot
Detailansicht
Katalogkarte GBA
Katalogkarte ISBD
Suche präzisieren
Drucken
Download RIS
Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen
Titel Changing provenance areas of the Cenozoic Central Myanmar Basin sediments discriminated using Hf values of detrital zircons
VerfasserIn Cynthia Brezina, Ruth A. J. Robinson, Randy R. Parrish, Matthew S. A. Horstwood, Michael I. Bird, Nay Win Oo, Myint Thein
Konferenz EGU General Assembly 2010
Medientyp Artikel
Sprache Englisch
Digitales Dokument PDF
Erschienen In: GRA - Volume 12 (2010)
Datensatznummer 250042836
 
Zusammenfassung
The syntaxis region of the eastern Himalayas is a complex geological collision zone where uplift, deformation and erosion have influenced landscape evolution during the Cenozoic. The syntaxis region has several large river systems draining the present day configuration of catchments, including the Tsangpo, Brahmaputra, Irrawaddy, Salween, and Mekong. The Tsangpo follows a circuitous route around the Namche Barwa before draining into the Brahmaputra, and earlier connections to the large rivers of southern Asia have been suggested in the literature. Liang et al. (2008) used the ɛHf values of detrital zircons from a Late Miocene Central Myanmar Basin sample, and from two Himalayan batholiths in the syntaxis, to show that the Miocene sediment contain Gangdese-like zircons with positive ɛHf values from Tibet, rather than more negative ɛHf values of zircons from inside the syntaxis. They concluded that there was a Tsangpo-Irrawaddy connection in the Late Miocene. Here we show, using U/Pb dating and ɛHf analyses of detrital zircons extracted from Eocene, Oligocene, and a suite of Miocene deposits, that the distribution of detrital zircon ɛHf values in the different aged rock units change through time, reflecting a change in provenance, as well as uplift, erosion and mixing of zircons from previously deposited sediments. We have compared all the published ɛHf data for the Transhimalayan batholiths in Tibet and Myanmar, and can identify the different provenance areas for the Cenozoic samples based on the range of ɛHf values and ages measured for the detrital zircons. Mostly positive ɛHf values for the detrital zircons contained in Eocene sediments are indistinguishable from Gangdese values and ages, supporting our hypothesis that the proto-Irrawaddy river was tapping the Gangdese batholith during the Eocene, and that the Tsango-Irrawaddy connection dates back to at least 43Ma, approximately the age of our oldest sample from the Myanmar Central Basin. The Oligocene samples also have a Gangdese provenance. Significantly, the ɛHf signature of detrital zircons changes in the Miocene deposits and negative ɛHf values similar to those of the Dianxi-Burma batholith are the dominant signature, with positive ɛHf values becoming less common for the younger Miocene samples. We interpret this change in provenance to signal the disconnection of the Tsangpo-Irrawaddy river system, and that it failed to keep pace with uplift in the syntaxis about 18-20Ma, coincident with major reorganisation in the orogen, the onset of strike-slip movement on the Sagaing Fault, and widespread magmatic events in the Gangdese batholith. It is also earlier than the Late Miocene timing suggested by Liang et al. (2008). Our results explain why Transhimalayan detritus arrives in the Bay of Bengal in the Early Miocene, and provides new palaeogeographic reconstructions and timing upon which landscape evolution tectonic-erosion coupling questions can be addressed. One such question is why did the Tsango-Irrawaddy connection fail at 18-20Ma? Reference: Liang, Y-H. et al. (2008) Detrital zircon evidence from Burma for reorganization of the Eastern Himalayan river system. American Journal of Science, 308, 618-638.