dot
Detailansicht
Katalogkarte GBA
Katalogkarte ISBD
Suche präzisieren
Drucken
Download RIS
Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen
Titel The Faroe Islands geological stripping using weak assumptions
VerfasserIn Gabriel Strykowski, Morten Sparre Andersen
Konferenz EGU General Assembly 2010
Medientyp Artikel
Sprache Englisch
Digitales Dokument PDF
Erschienen In: GRA - Volume 12 (2010)
Datensatznummer 250042830
 
Zusammenfassung
In a complex geological-/geophysical setup with a general source distribution, the result of the source modeling from the gravity data depends on how the available independent information is being used. The model construction is implicitly hierarchic in a sense that, ultimately, the final inversion for the unknown sources (us) is done from the residual gravity signal Δgus. In order to make a successful inversion (so that the unknown source model is a good approximation to the existing true source distribution) the precondition must be that Δgus is modeled correctly from the measured gravity signal Δg and using the independent information about the subsurface. Implicitly, the gravity attraction Δgks from the known sources (ks) must be modeled correctly so that: Δgus = Δg - Δgks yields as good as possible Δgus; a geological stripping. In short, the hierarchy in model construction implies that any error in Δgks generates an error in Δgus. Consequently, a lot of effort should be put into the correct modeling of Δgks. One pitfall of the geological stripping is that the wrong use of either the mathematical assumptions or the independent information only in very severe cases can be contradicted by Δgus. However, the fact that Δgus does not contradict Δgks is not synonymous to that Δgks (and thereby Δgus) is correctly modeled. In our quest to do the “objective geological stripping” we advocate a cautious method in modeling Δgks for a large marine area with complex geology around The Faroe Islands. One such technique is to use the independent knowledge of bathymetry to “strip off” the gravitational effect of the sea water without any assumption about the mass density contrast to the sea bottom (that could bias Δgks). Another technique is to use in combination both the gravity anomalies and the horizontal gradients, i.e. a transformation of Δg and Δgks. A consequence of Green’s third identity of potential theorem is that a unique solution cannot be obtained by simply transforming the external field. However, we can safely assume that the two types of signals (the gravity anomalies and the horizontal gradients) are generated by the same source distribution. Although a unique model of the subsurface cannot be obtained, we can utilize that the weighting between the contributions from the shallow/known sources and the deep/unknown sources is different in these two types of the gravity data. Knowing independently, e.g. from seismograms, the approximate depth to the “unknown sources” bears a possibility to get a good model of Δgus even whenΔgksandΔgus are correlated.