dot
Detailansicht
Katalogkarte GBA
Katalogkarte ISBD
Suche präzisieren
Drucken
Download RIS
Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen
Titel Temporal and spatial variations of soil CO2 flux over a soybean field in Nebraska
VerfasserIn Liukang Xu, Rod Madsen, Dayle McDermitt, Dave Scoby, Tim Arkebauer
Konferenz EGU General Assembly 2010
Medientyp Artikel
Sprache Englisch
Digitales Dokument PDF
Erschienen In: GRA - Volume 12 (2010)
Datensatznummer 250041793
 
Zusammenfassung
Soil CO2 flux (Fc) is the largest component of the ecosystem carbon balance. It is also an important piece of information in the study of soil carbon storage potential and soil carbon dynamics. Fc has a strong temporal variation over the course of a day or a season because of changes in soil temperature, soil moisture, above ground vegetation physiological activities, and other driving variables. It also shows a strong spatial variation because of high heterogeneity of soil properties in the field. To understand the temporal and spatial variations of Fc over an agricultural field, we used an automated soil CO2 flux system (LI-8100/8150, LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA) to continuously measure the Fc at 16 different locations in a soybean field for two entire growing seasons in 2006 and 2007. The automated system is a nonsteady state closed-chamber system. Our results show that Fc varied from 0.4 to 8.0 micromol m-2s-1 depending on the time of season, the soil temperature and the moisture content. The Coefficient of Variation (CV) over the 16 locations was in the range of 20-60% for the major portion of the time. Rain events could increase CV to more than 100% because Fc responds to rain events differently depending on the amount of residual material at the soil surface. Manual measurements at weekly or longer time intervals often fail to accurately estimate the total soil CO2 flux. Our data show that weekly measurements could have ±5% error in total soil CO2 flux as compared with continuous measurements. Biweekly or monthly measurements could have ±13%, ±25% errors, respectively. Our result strongly suggests that high spatial and temporal resolution data is essential in accurately estimating the total soil CO2 flux and in understanding the soil carbon dynamics and how biological and environmental variables regulate the flux. Also some critical requirements in making chamber-based soil CO2 flux will be discussed.