dot
Detailansicht
Katalogkarte GBA
Katalogkarte ISBD
Suche präzisieren
Drucken
Download RIS
Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen
Titel Earth's Surface Heat Flux
VerfasserIn J. Huw Davies, D. Rhodri Davies
Konferenz EGU General Assembly 2010
Medientyp Artikel
Sprache Englisch
Digitales Dokument PDF
Erschienen In: GRA - Volume 12 (2010)
Datensatznummer 250034345
 
Zusammenfassung
We present a revised estimate of Earth’s surface heat flux that is based upon an improved heat-flow data-set and new methodologies. Our estimate is 47 ± 2 TW. Our data-set contains 38,347 measurements, which is ~55% greater than used in previous studies. Our final estimate is made up of 4 components: (i) Young oceanic crust: our methodology, like others, accounts for hydrothermal circulation in young oceanic crust by utilising a half-space cooling approximation. (ii) Continents and older oceans: the novel part of this work is the implementation of this second component. For the rest of Earth’s surface (i.e. excluding oceanic crust < 65Ma), we estimate the average heat flow for different geologic domains as defined by global digital geology maps. We then produce a global estimate by multiplying these averages by the total global area of that geologic domain (note that this methodology depends upon a correlation between geology and heat flux, which is demonstrated in our data. While the correlation is weak, it is sufficient enough to be included in the estimate - an alternative would be to undertake a simple global area-weighted average. Indeed previous studies that have done so yield similar results). The averaging is done on a polygon set which results from an intersection of a 1° equal area grid with the original geology polygons; this minimises the adverse influence of clustering. These operations and estimates are derived accurately using methodologies from Geographical Information Science (GIS). (iii) Antarctica: the virtually un-sampled Antarctica is considered separately. We use heat-flow estimates based on magnetic field measurements, which are supported by seismic measurements. (iv) Hot-spot correction: we make a small correction for hot-spots in young oceanic lithosphere, since the parameters for the half-space cooling approximation were derived from observations that avoided hot-spot tracks. A range of analyses will also be presented, including: (i) the use of various digital geology data-sets; (ii) estimates derived with and without the grids; and (iii) removing geology domains with less than a threshold number of observations. Our preferred analysis only uses geological domains with at least 50 observations. These analyses, combined with rigorous statistical estimates of the error, provide a measure of robustness. Our final preferred estimate of 47 ± 2 TW is slightly greater than previous estimates.