dot
Detailansicht
Katalogkarte GBA
Katalogkarte ISBD
Suche präzisieren
Drucken
Download RIS
Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen
Titel A rainfall amount weighted meteoric water line for use in hydrological applications
VerfasserIn C. E. Hughes, J. Crawford
Konferenz EGU General Assembly 2009
Medientyp Artikel
Sprache Englisch
Digitales Dokument PDF
Erschienen In: GRA - Volume 11 (2009)
Datensatznummer 250024971
 
Zusammenfassung
Use of stable isotope data in precipitation from GNIP or other sources commonly involves determining a local meteoric water line (LMWL) based on a least squares regression (LSR) of monthly rainfall data. Local meteoric water lines are used in a variety or hydrological applications, commonly to determine the relationship of surface or groundwaters to a potential precipitation source or to determine the degree of evaporative enrichment of the water. The intersection between the LMWL and a local evaporation line is commonly used as a start point for calculating evaporative enrichment. The equations widely used to determine the LMWL give equal weighting to all data points regardless of the rainfall amount they represent. In reality smaller rainfall amounts are more likely to have a lower d-excess due to re-evaporation of raindrops or biases in the sampling method. Larger rainfall events tend to be more depleted in the heavier isotopes. By allowing small rainfall amounts, which may have experienced evaporative enrichment, to have equal influence on the slope of the LMWL, a bias towards the less hydrologically significant rainfall is introduced. For applications of the LMWL relating to groundwater recharge, dam storage and major flow events it is the higher rainfall events that are most important, so it is appropriate to use a LMWL that is weighted towards those events so as not to overestimate the d-excess of hydrologically important depleted rainfall. We propose the use of a rainfall amount weighted LMWL (δ2H = a -‹ δ18O + b) for hydrological applications, where the parameters a and b in the line of best fit, yi = axi + b, are obtained by minimising the least squares equation: -ˆ‘n p (y - ax - b) i=1-i--i----i--- LS = -ˆ‘n i=1 pi where pi is the rainfall (or precipitation) amount, n is the number of measurements and y and x represent δ2H and δ18O, respectively. Using the GNIP we test the hypothesis that the rainfall weighted LSR will have larger slopes for most sites, with the impact most pronounced in arid and semi-arid areas. For Alice Springs in arid central Australia the ordinary LSR gave a LMWL of δ2H = 6.86-‹ δ18O + 4.48, whereas the rainfall weighted LSR was δ2H = 7.52-‹ δ18O + 9.3. In contrast relatively small increases in the slope of the LMWL were observed at Australian coastal sites.