dot
Detailansicht
Katalogkarte GBA
Katalogkarte ISBD
Suche präzisieren
Drucken
Download RIS
Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen
Titel Dissimilatory Nitrate Reduction to Ammonium (DNRA) potential in the re-connected floodplain of the River Cole (Oxfordshire, UK).
VerfasserIn F. Sgouridis, C. M. Heppell, M. Trimmer, G. Wharton
Konferenz EGU General Assembly 2009
Medientyp Artikel
Sprache Englisch
Digitales Dokument PDF
Erschienen In: GRA - Volume 11 (2009)
Datensatznummer 250024360
 
Zusammenfassung
Floodplains are recognised as an important interface for nitrate removal at the landscape scale, but there is a lack of available information on the nitrate attenuation capacity of reconnected floodplains following river restoration. Whilst numerous studies have documented the dominant role of heterotrophic denitrification for nitrate loss in these environments, DNRA, a microbial pathway that conserves N in the ecosystem, has previously been considered unimportant in aerobic floodplain soils due mainly to its anoxic nature (Tiedje, 1988). However, recent research has shown DNRA to be of importance in N-limited, redox fluctuating tropical soils (Silver et al., 2001, Huygens et al., 2007). This could potentially be important in the context of temperate intermittently saturated reconnected river floodplains designed to tackle diffuse nitrate pollution. Therefore the objectives of this research were to quantify (i) the magnitude of and; (ii) factors controlling DNRA and denitrification potential in four different land use zones (grazing grassland, buffer zone, pasture and fritillary meadow), and with depth (0 – 120 cm) in a re-connected rural floodplain of the River Cole, UK. Denitrification and DNRA potential rates were measured with a combination of 15NO3- isotope tracer addition and combined microdiffusion - hypobromite oxidation methods. DNRA potential rates were approximately 40times less than denitrification potential rates, in all samples, ranging from 0.02 – 2.64 mg N and 7 – 24 mg N Kg-1 of dry soil day-1 respectively. Denitrification potential rates were found to be significantly different (P