![Hier klicken, um den Treffer aus der Auswahl zu entfernen](images/unchecked.gif) |
Titel |
Localized Gravity/Topography Correlation and Admittance Spectra one the Moon |
VerfasserIn |
Y. Ishihara, N. Namiki, S. Sugita, K. Matsumoto, S. Goossens, H. Araki, H. Noda, S. Sasaki, T. Iwata, H. Hanada |
Konferenz |
EGU General Assembly 2009
|
Medientyp |
Artikel
|
Sprache |
Englisch
|
Digitales Dokument |
PDF |
Erschienen |
In: GRA - Volume 11 (2009) |
Datensatznummer |
250022446
|
|
|
|
Zusammenfassung |
Lunar surface and structure can be separate into two parts. The lunar near side crust and
far side crust differ remarkably in thickness. This difference probably caused by
difference of thermal evolution and state (elastic thickness) and catering history on both
side.
The correlations and admittance between the topography and gravity anomalies provide
important information on the level of isostatic compensation of the lithosphere at the
geological timescale, and reflect its thermo-mechanical state. Therefore, localized correlation
and admittance analysis is one of the most important studies of selenodesy.
A global correlation between topography and gravity of the Moon obtained
by Clementine and Lunar Prospector missions, respectively, reveals high value
at long wavelength and low value at short wavelength. Such characteristics are
distinguished from those of the Earth and other terrestrial planets, whose global
correlation between topography and gravity is low at long wavelength. The distinct
correlation between topography and gravity of the Moon may indicate that the lunar
topography is supported by multiple compensation mechanism. Further, an incomplete
coverage of Doppler tracking data prior to Kaguya (SELENE) gravity experiment
probably contributed to the correlation. Because the Moon is synchronously rotating
with its revolution around the Earth, a spacecraft orbiting over the far side is not
visible from ground stations. In either case, it is significant to decompose local
correlation from global ones in order to investigate internal structure of the Moon
from spherical harmonic model of gravity (LP75G [1]) and topography (GLTM-2
[2]).
Japanese lunar exploration Kaguya (SELENE) has two kinds of selenodesical
experiments. One is RSAT/VRAD (gravity mapping with direct tracking over far-side)
experiment and another is Laser ALTimeter (LALT; topography mapping) experiment. These
two experiments enable us to conduct localized analysis for the Moon. Therefore we attempt
localized spectral analysis of the Moon first and then apply possible compensation
mechanisms to explain the observed admittance.
Kaguya mission has been yielding representation of lunar gravity and topography (shape)
substantially superior in resolution and accuracy to earlier solutions. For global lunar gravity
field, an accurate spherical harmonic model of gravitational potential up to degree and order
100 (SGM100g) was derived from one year tracking (including 4-way Doppler) data [3]. For
topography, LALT has obtained more than 6 million altitude measurements with 5 m
precision, from which a spherical harmonic expansion of topography to degree and order
359 (STM359_grid-02) has been determined [4]. In this study, we use those new
models.
We employ the spatio-spectral localization technique [5] to obtain gravity/shape
correlation and admittance spectra as function of position on the Moon. In this analysis, we
localize harmonic field with axisymmetric windows of constant diameter, described by Lwin
zonal harmonic coefficients. This restricts the permissible range of l in the windowed fields at
both the low- (l > Lwin) and high-wave number ends (l < Lobs–Lwin, ; Lobs is the
maximum degree of observation) . We chose four fixed windows with Lwin = 5, 10,
17, 26 (equivalent to spatial scales 2200, 1100, 640 and 420 km, respectively).
These window sizes correspond to huge-, large-, middle-, and small-size of impact
basins.
For up to degree 50 with Lwin = 5 scale, it is clearly shown that the near-side contains
distinct anti-correlation regions whereas the far-side is mostly occupied by high correlation
regions. This difference is mainly due to large mascon basins in near-side, such as mare
Imbrium. For Lwin = 10 and 17 scales, we can see anti-correlation regions at not only
near-side but also far-side. Locations of anti-correlation regions in the far-side correspond to
impact basins (Type II basin [6]). However, lots of far side basins (Type I basin [6]) are not
indicated by anti-correlations for these window sizes. For Lwin = 26 scale, we can see weak
and spatially small anti-correlation at center of Type I basins. This difference mainly due to
spatial size of anti-correlation. In contrast, almost all near-side basins show anti-correlations
for all window sizes. This difference is probably due to the difference of elastic
thickness between near-side and far-side during the age of impact basin formation. It
provides important information on the origin of lunar dichotomy and lunar thermal
history.
The admittance spectra of the South Pole-Aitken basin (SPA) and far-side highland terrain
(FHT) show no significant difference. This means that elastic thickness of two regions are not
so different. On the other hand, crustal thickness of two regions are drastically different. It
suggests that elatic part of upper mantle of SPA region is probably thicker than
FHT.
Acknowledgements: SHTOOLS2.4 [7] was used for calculating localized correlation
and admittance spectra.
References: [1] A. S. Konopliv et al. (1998) Science, 281, 1476-1480. [2] D. E.
Smith et al. (1997) JGR, 102, 1591-1611. [3] K. Matsumoto et al. this meeting.
[4] H. Araki et al. Submitted to Science. [5] M. Simons et al., (1997) Geophys. J.
Int., 131, 24-44. [6] N. Namiki et al. Science in press. [7] M. Wieczorek, (2007)
http://www.ipgp.jussieu.fr/~wieczor/SHTOOLS/SHTOOLS.html. |
|
|
|
|
|